Skip to main content

www.hksccm.org

2008 Triage Decision for Society of Critical Care Medicine Triage Priority 3 Patients and Their Outcomes

Dr SHUM Hoi Ping, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, November 2008
 
 
 

Objective: To identify factors associated with the triage decision for Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) triage priority 3 patients (critically ill but have a reduced likelihood of recovery because of underlying disease or nature of their acute illness), and their outcomes.

 

Design: A single-centre, prospective observational cohort study.

 

Setting: General medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary regional hospital.

 

Interventions: None

 

Measurements and main results:  The study period lasted 9 months from Jan 2007 to Sept 2007 and all patients were followed up for at least half a year.  Of the 1346 triaged patients, 250 belonging to SCCM priority 3 were included for analysis.  30.4% (76/250) were admitted and 69.6% (174/250) rejected.  Medical cases were more likely to be rejected than surgical cases or neuro-surgical cases (p<0.001).  Diagnostic category differed significantly between those admitted and those rejected (p<0.001).  Those with poorer physician-predicted chance of long-term survival (>50% chance of death within 1 month) were more likely to be rejected (53.4% vs. 9.2%, p<0.001) than those with a better predicted prognosis (no fatal disease).  The MPMII0-predicted mortality was higher for those rejected from ICU care than those admitted (47.6% vs. 32.4%, p<0.001).  In multiple logistic regression analysis, the following factors were independently correlated with denial from ICU admission: non-post-operative status (OR 26.2, 95% CI 7.6-90.9, p<0.001), and those predicted to have more than 50% chance of death in the coming 1-month (OR 11.8, 95% CI 4.6-30.5, p<0.001).  Cox regression analysis showed that the following were independently correlated with higher medium-term mortality: rejection from ICU care (HR 2.8, CI 1.88-4.15, p<0.001), higher MPMII0-predicted mortality (HR 1.12 for every 10% increment, CI 1.06-1.19, p<0.001), and presence of renal disease as admission diagnosis (HR 2.28, CI 1.23-4.24, p=0.009).

 

Conclusion:  For SCCM triage priority 3 patients, non-post-operative status and physician-predicted chance of poor long-term survival correlated with the triage decision to reject.  Patient had lower medium-term survival if they were denied from ICU admission, had higher MPMII0-predicted patient mortality or had renal disease as the admission diagnosis. 

 

Keywords:

SCCM triage priority 3 patients, Intensive care, triage decision, survival

 

References: 

  1. Lyons RA, Wareham C, Hutchings HA, et al: population requirement for adult critical care beds: A prospective quantitative and qualitative study: Lancet 2000; 355:595-98
  2. Offenstadt G, Moreno R, Palomar M, et al: Intensive care medicine in Europe.  Crit Care Clin 2006; 22:425-32.
  3. Judson JA, Fisher MM: Intensive care in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Clin 2006; 22:407-23.
  4. Poalillo FE, Jimenez EJ: Critical care in the United States of America.  Crit Care Clin 2006; 22:447-55.
  5. Hospital Authority Statistical Report 2005-2006.  Hong Kong; 2006. Table 9.1a
  6. Hospital Authority Cost Analysis Report 2005-2007. Hong Kong; 2007. 7-9
  7. Joynt GM, Gomersall CD, Tan P, et al: Prospective evaluation of patients refused admission to an intensive care unit: triage, futility and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27(9): 1459-65.
  8. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, et al: Compliance with triage to intensive care recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(11): 2132-36.
  9. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Montuclard L, Timsit JF, et al: Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:774-78.
  10. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Montuclard L, Timsit JF, et al: Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(4):750-55
  11. Kollef MH, Shuster DP: Predicting ICU outcomes with scoring systems: Underlying concepts and principles.  Crit Care Med 1994, 22:101-18
  12. Vincent JL, Artigas A, Bihari D, et al: Guidelines for the utilisation of intensive care units.  Inten Care Med 1994; 20:163-4.
  13. Giraudi T, Dhainaut JF, Vaxelaire JF: Iatrogenic complications in adult intensive care units: a prospective two-center study.  Crit Care Med, 1993; 21: 40-51
  14. Task forces of the American college of Critical Care Medicine. Society of Critical Care Medicine (1999) Guideline for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage.  Crit Care Med. 1999, 27:633-38
  15. Clinical Operation Committee (Critical Care): Admission and discharge guidelines for adult intensive care services. Hospital Authority Head Office, operation circular No: 13/2004
  16. Nelson JE, Angus DC, Weissfeld LA et al: End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey.  Crit Care Med. 2006, 34:2547-53
  17. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linte-Zwirbe WT, et al: Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med.  2004, 32:638-43
  18. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, et al: Mortality probability models (MPMII) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.  JAMA, 1993, 270; 2478-86
  19. Arabi Y, Al Shirawi N, Memish Z, et al: Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study.  Crit Care Med.  2003; 7:R116-R122
  20. Sprung CL, Geber D, Eidelman LA, et al: Evaluation of triage decisions for intensve care admission.  Crit Care Med. 1999, 27: 1073-9
  21. Vanhecke TE, Gandhi M, McCullough PA, et al: Outcomes of patients considered for, but not admitted to, the intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med. 2008, 36:812-17
  22. McCabe WR, Jackson GG: Gram-negative bacteremia: etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med 1962, 110; 847-55
  23. Sinuff T, Adhikari NK, Cook DL, et al: Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems. Crit Care Med.  2006, 34:878-85
  24. Society of Critical Care Medicine: Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning distribution of intensive care resources.  Crit Care Med 1994; 22:358-62
  25. Ryan D, Conlon N, Phelan D, et al: The very elderly in intensive care: admission characteristics and mortality.  Crit Care Resusc. 2008; 10:110-18
  26. Marik PE: Management of the critical ill geriatric patient. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34; Suppl 9:S176-82
  27. Yap HY, Joynt GM, Gomersall CD: Ethical attitudes of intensive care physicians in Hong Kong: questionnaire survey. Hong Kong Med J, 2004, 10:244-50
  28. Halpern NA, Pastores SM, Greenstein RJ, et al: Critical care medicine in the United States 1985-2000: An analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs.  Crit Care Med 2004, 32:1254-9.
  29. Vincent JL: European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: Results of an ethical questionnaire.  Inten Care Med 1990; 16:256-64
  30. Simchen E, Sprung CL, Galai N, et al: Survival of critically ill patients hospitalised in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive careunit beds.  Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1654-61
  31. Cheng DCH, Byrick RJ, Knobel E: Structural models for intermediate care areas.  Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2266-71
  32. Morales IJ, Peters SG, Afessa B: Hospital mortality rate and length of stay in patients admitted at night to the intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med.  2003; 31: 858-63
  33. Luyt CE, Combes A, Aegerter P, et al: Mortality among patients admitted to intensive care units during weekday day shifts compared with “off” hours.  Crit Care Med.  2007; 35: 3-11
  34. Arabi Y, Alshimemeri A, Taher S: Weekend and weeknight admissions have the same outcomes of weekdays admissions to an intensive care unit with onsite intensivist coverage.  Crit Care Med.  2006; 34: 605-11
  35. Metcalfe Ma, Sloggett A, McPherson K: Mortality among appropriately referred patients refused admission to intensive care units. Lancet 1997: 350:7-12
  36. Castella X, Artigas A, Bion J: A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a mulitcenter, multinational study.  The European / North American Severity Study Group.  Crit Care Med.  1995; 23: 1327-35
  37. Chao CL: Comparison of predictive accuracy among six prognosis prediction systems for patient mortality in intensive care units.  J Formos Med Assoc.  2002; 101: 406-15
  38. Arabi Y, Haddad S, Goraj R, et al: Assesssment of performance of four mortality prediction systems in a Saudi Arabian intensive care unit.  Crit Care 2002; 6: 166-74
  39. Ricci Z, Cruz D, Ronco C: The RIFLE criteria and mortality in acute kidney injury: A systematic review.  Kidney Int. 2008; 73: 538-46
  40. Brannen AL, Godgrey LJ, Goetter WE: Prediction of outcome from critical illness.  A comparision of clinical judgment with a prediction rule.  Arch Intern Med 1989, 149:1083-6.